🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average employee. Choosing the right medical coverage for our business – or for households – appears to require demands a PhD in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Costly

According to recent research, the average family spends $27,000 annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently the government is shut down because partisan disputes regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker making average wages must contribute approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company pays about 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you contrast it to what average US resident spends. I can name dozens of businesses that are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that in comprehensive systems, those payments include retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting medical services. When including these expenses versus our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

For America, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. And, like much of our government's military, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would render administration much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complex (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers that we must do every year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding of coverage among workers – contrasted with the current system where they have to decipher the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' health histories for risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses which hire more than half of American employees and fund half the economic output. It enables employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, despite increased taxation required, would remain a superior and less expensive strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, based on major studies. Perhaps a bright spot amid present circumstances could be that we take a hard look at ourselves and agree that big changes are necessary.